Commission publishes EDC criteria

European Commission proposes strongly science-based criteria to identify endocrine disruptors, endorses WHO definition, and publishes impact assessment on EDC criteria

EDCs and reproductive aging

Animal study at National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark finds perinatal exposure to EDC mixtures leads to earlier reproductive aging in female rats

Commission breaches EU law and treaty

European Parliament passes resolution on endocrine disruptors and condemns Commission’s illegal delay in setting scientific criteria for EDCs

Insights into EU EDC debate

Articles in Le Monde report about industry-linked scientists advising the European Commission, present French Foreign Minister’s opinion on the EDC debate in the EU

Companies want protective EDC criteria

IKEA, H&M, COOP Denmark and other leading companies urge European Commission to adopt science-based EDC criteria that protect citizens’ health

Opinion: EDC debate political, not scientific

European Commission should consider potency in scientific criteria to identify EDCs, according to U.S. consultant; highlights NGOs’ and researchers’ agenda in EDC controversy

EDCs: Hazard vs. risk

Health & Environment article addresses challenge of effectively regulating endocrine disrupters; explains hazard-based and risk-based approaches

Opinion: EC guilty of EDC delays

Article in Le Monde critically discusses European Commission’s impact assessment on criteria to identify EDCs; final EDC criteria expected on June 15, 2016

EDC: Motion of censure fails

Motion of censure on European Commission stopped due to insufficient number of signatures after 16 Members of European Parliament withdraw theirs

MEPs criticize Commission over delayed EDC criteria

Members of the European Parliament submit motion of censure to President of European Parliament; criticize EC’s failure to provide EDC criteria in due time