Dispute over EDCs continues

Correspondence articles in Nature express opposing opinions on hazard identification of endocrine disruptors and how they should be regulated

Potency missing in EDC criteria

European Chemical Industry Council responds to EU Commission’s public consultation of EDC criteria; supports use of WHO/IPCS definition but urges Commission to include potency

Endocrine Society concerned about EDC criteria

Endocrine Society submits comment to EU Commission’s public consultation on EDC criteria; criticizes high burden of proof and advocates for EDC criteria reflecting state of science

Reaction to public consultation on EDC criteria

CHEM Trust responds to EU Commission’s public consultation on EDC criteria; urges EU institutions to change Commission’s proposal to better protect people and wildlife

New tool to evaluate EDC science

Collaboration of international scientists develop SYRINA framework for reviewing and assessing studies on endocrine disruptors; urge regulators to use these new methods for decision-making

EU EDC criteria: Public consultations

European Commission launches two public consultations on proposed EDC criteria for plant protection and biocidal products; feedback can be given until July 28, 2016

Opinion: Commission’s EDC criteria are illegal

Environmental law organization ClientEarth publishes legal opinion judging the European Commission’s EDC criteria non-compliant with the mandating regulations

EU EDC criteria: Highest level of protection

European Commission’s Director for Food and Feed Safety, Innovation affirms Commission’s commitment to protect human health and environment from endocrine disruptors

Scientists send letter about EDC criteria

Group of scientists express concern about proposed EDC criteria in open letter to EU Health Commissioner Andriukaitis and make recommendations for improvement

Webinar on EDCs for investors

ChemSec hosts webinar on endocrine disruptors for investors, presents successful business strategies incorporating phase-out of EDCs